Anderson Window Lawsuit is filed by the homeowners against their property developer for wrongful eviction of them from their property. The suit was filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of California. The complaint named the Anderson Company as the defendant.
The complaint charged that the Anderson Company (icals in the case) had failed to make any reasonable attempts to assist the homeowners in paying their rental arrears, maintain the property in a safe condition and construct the structure according to local building regulations. The complaint further alleged that this conduct deprived the owners of their “right to reasonably enjoy a safe and protected environment in which to live.”
Anderson Window Lawsuit
The homeowners were represented by attorneys. The case was heard by the judge assigned to the case, and a decision was made. In the end, the judge ordered the Anderson Window Replacement Manufacturer to pay the remaining balance of the outstanding balance, plus additional legal fees. The manufacturer was instructed not to enter into any agreements related to any further dealings with the homeowners.
The next step was for me to represent the homeowners.
I contacted an attorney from the California State Bar Association, who was knowledgeable in Anderson Window Lawsuits. He informed me that such cases are quite common in San Diego and that most of them settled out of court. Since many of these cases settled out of court, it was important that I retain an attorney with enough knowledge of the process to guide me through the lawsuit process and get a fair and equitable resolution. This attorney was a no-nonsense type of person and didn’t want anything to get “overlooked”.
The attorney assigned to the case was a thorough and diligent attorney.
He retained the necessary documents and presented a strong defense on behalf of the homeowners. Throughout the litigation process, I kept in close contact with the Anderson Window Replacement Manufacturer to ensure that they were following all applicable guidelines and local code requirements. My goal was to ensure that their installation efforts followed all applicable ordinances and regulations. This included obtaining a certificate of occupancy and obtaining a permit from the local planning and building departments.
Unfortunately, this did not resolve the problem and the manufacturer’s representatives would not negotiate with the homeowners.
The case ultimately went to trial and I was able to present the facts and the arguments related to these issues. I was able to file a lawsuit against the manufacturer in June of 2021. The Anderson Window Replacement Manufacturer was required to post a bond in the amount of the balance due and was also required to post a surety bond. The manufacturer’s attorneys and I did not talk much at all during the litigation process and only handled a small percentage of the case.
Fortunately for the homeowners and I, the Anderson Window Replacement Manufacturer eventually signed a consent agreement that they will correct any problems that they violate and will make certain changes to ensure that this does not happen again.
Unfortunately, the manufacturer did not agree to the consent agreement and we had to go to court. The attorneys were excellent at representing the homeowners and obtaining a successful judgment. Although this was a difficult case to work in terms of a trial, we were able to get a judgment against the manufacturer.