What You Should Know About a Stryker Hip Lawsuit

If you are a victim of a serious hip condition and need to seek medical attention then it is imperative that you contact a qualified personal injury attorney who is experienced in Stryker Hip lawsuits. Many victims of this condition who cannot afford to undergo surgery are using some of the most experienced personal injury attorneys, who are able to file a Stryker Hip suit on your behalf and therefore there is usually no charge unless you win a settlement or award. The fact is that the medical condition has now been identified as a contributing factor in as many as 80% of all cases. There is now a legal solution for the thousands of people seeking to regain their mobility and physical freedom. There are several factors including a faulty surgery, repetitive overuse and other injuries, which can be used to file a successful Stryker Hip Suit against the manufacturer and/or doctor who misdiagnosed and improperly treated the condition.

Although we are experiencing an economic downturn there are billions of dollars being spent on lawsuits such as these.

Lawsuits such as Stryker Hip Suit are being brought by the families of children who have suffered serious and debilitating injuries as the result of playing sports such as football, soccer, basketball, tennis and the like. In addition to the serious injuries, they often suffer from debilitating psychological injuries as well. If you or a loved one has been caused by the negligence of a healthcare professional and subsequently been awarded compensation via a Stryker Hip Suit then it should be kept in mind that the damages awarded are in addition to any pain and suffering you may have to endure. These lawsuits are becoming increasingly common in personal injury litigation as doctors, healthcare providers, and manufacturers are being held responsible for their actions.

One of the most common causes for a Stryker lawsuit is related to metal poisoning.

Symptoms of metal poisoning include severe pain, bruising, loss of movement, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and fever. If the metal poisoning has been present for more than six months it can be classified as chronic or long term physical debilitation. If your lawsuit is as a result of a metal poisoning you may be entitled to financial compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, future loss of income, pain and suffering, and more.

Another type of Stryker lawsuit relates to the manufacture of a device similar to Rheumatoid Arthritis Shoes that was supposed to help ease the pain associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

The plaintiff in this case, identified as plaintiff’s relative filed suit against the defendant under the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for a violation of the ADA by refusing to provide a device that would properly diagnose and treat their relative with Rheumatoid Arthritis. According to the complaint the relative suffered from excruciating pain on the left side of his body for approximately two years. The relative’s attorneys also filed a claim for emotional distress, as well as a claim for compensation for his suffering, since the devices required him to wear leg braces.

While all plaintiffs in a Stryker hip lawsuit are entitled to monetary damages based on the extent of their injuries, it may be difficult for you to determine how much each element of the stryker injury was responsible for causing your loved one’s death.

For instance, if the metal-on-metal implants corrode naturally over time, but the metal is still allowed to be used, then the amount of monetary damages is likely going to be severely diminished. Conversely, if the metal-on-metal implants began to fail, and the metal began to corrode in place, then the level of monetary damages will be greater. This is why the relative’s lawyers are not likely to receive any monetary settlement should their relative accept a settlement offer from the defendant.

It is important to note that Stryker lawsuits, while very serious, are not generally governed by tort law.

Tort law allows individuals to be held responsible for other people’s injuries caused by their negligence, regardless of whether they had a duty of care towards the individual. Because of this fact, it can be incredibly difficult for deputy attorneys to win their lawsuits, especially in the event that the plaintiff has sustained significant injuries as a result of their inattentiveness.