In the fall of 1996, a nervous Rudy Indiana attorney sitting in his law office heard a telephone call from a worried constituent. The constituent had recently heard about the two-year statute of limitations for divorce. He asked the attorney to discuss the statute of limitations issue. The attorney listened and then told the constituent that he would have to research the question of the two-year statute of limitations in advance and get back to him. He reminded the constituent that he had voted against renewing the statute of limitations in the past and believed it should be revisited.
Rudy Indiana Otis Law
The phone call ended abruptly but not before the attorney thoughtfully explained to the caller that there was in fact a statute of limitation issue. According to the attorney, this particular case was like many others he had handled. In many cases the judgment debtor had simply moved out of the area but did not file the appropriate paperwork. Sometimes the debtor could not even be located in Indiana at all.
The speaker told the attorney that he could easily find a good lawyer to assist in these cases and also asked if he might be able to suggest someone to speak with the rudy Indiana otis law office.
After several brief phone conversations, the attorney agreed to contact the gentleman and set up a consultation. During the consultation, the attorney noticed that the judgment debtor had relocated yet had not filed bankruptcy. He explained that although he could not file bankruptcy there were some other options available to him.
The attorney explained that in most circumstances, if the judgment debtor lived in Indiana, there were at least three years of grace under the new statute of limitations laws.
This meant that he could possibly still receive monetary compensation for his pain and suffering, although this was no guarantee. Also, he explained that there were at least several years in which the defendant could not collect any wages from the victim. This meant that he may be stuck paying the victim for the rest of his life, something that the injured person definitely did not need.
After reviewing the situation, the attorney immediately recommended that the man seek the services of a personal injury lawyer in Indiana.
He knew that this individual had experience in dealing with several such cases over the past several years, but this did not necessarily mean that this was the right professional to contact. The attorney spoke with several different lawyers, but the attorney in Indianapolis was the best one. He was able to obtain the necessary documentation on the case from the government and then build a strong case for the client.
Although the financial setback was the fault of another, the family was grateful for the legal services of the Indianapolis attorney.
Rudy is still working with the company and has been reaping the benefits of his legal services ever since. His two children are now well adjusted and doing quite well in school. They are now more outgoing and happy than they ever imagined possible, thanks to the efforts of their family lawyer.